| Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? | |
|
Author | Message |
---|
Shawn112
Posts : 151
Duel Points : 100
Duel Season : 0-0-1
Duel Career : 4-0-23
YGOPro Name : Shawn112
| Subject: Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:34 am | Premature Burial. Why is it banned? Let us compare Premature Burial with Monster Reborn
1. Premature Burial costs 800 life points to be activated, while Monster Reborn costs nothing (Monster Reborn 1, Premature Burial 0)
2. Monster Reborn special summons a monster from either player's graveyard, while Premature Burial special summons a monster from your graveyard (Monster Reborn 2, Premature Burial 0)
3. Monster Reborn lets you choose the position of the monster that you summon, while Premature Burial forces you to summon it in attack position (Monster Rebron 3, Premature Burial 0
4. Premature Burial becomes an equipped to the monster that you summon while Monster Reborn goes to the graveyard (Monster Reborn 3, Premature Burial 1
5. When Premature Burial is destroyed the monster summoned by this effect, the monster summoned by this card will be destroyed, while Monster Reborn is already in the grave (Monster Reborn 4, Premature Burial
Now why is Monster Reborn limited while Premature Burial is banned? Is it because it is an equip spell card? Even though that, don't you think Konami went a little too far. I mean, yes there is monsters who are advantaged when there are equipped with an equip spell card like Power Tool Dragon, Maha Vailo and some of the Vylon monsters. Also, some cards make equip spell cards back to the hand or to the deck like Fairy of the Spring and Vylon Matter. But, even with these two reasons, is this truly enough to say that this card deserves more than Monster Reborn? If there is any other reasons I did not mention that could be a reasons of his ban, please warn me, but for now, I don't think Premature Burial deserves more to be banned than Monster Reborn |
|
| |
Kenshi
Team : Super Friends
Posts : 569
Duel Points : 100
Duel Season : 0-0-0
Duel Career : 6-0-1
| Subject: Re: Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:51 am | 1. The cost really isn't anything for the player to be worried about. 2. Yes. 3. Yep. 4. Uhuh. 5. Mhmm. As a matter of fact there is something you missed that contributed towards the banning of Premature Burial. Something crucial. The fact that it's an equip card makes it a viable target for this card: http://yugioh.wikia.com/wiki/Hidden_ArmoryRecycling Premature Burial at such a low price is obviously unhealthy for the game. |
|
| |
Shawn112
Posts : 151
Duel Points : 100
Duel Season : 0-0-1
Duel Career : 4-0-23
YGOPro Name : Shawn112
| Subject: Re: Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? Sun Dec 16, 2012 2:54 am | Wow, but still, it would probably be at least semi-limited from now, or maybe limited |
|
| |
Kenshi
Team : Super Friends
Posts : 569
Duel Points : 100
Duel Season : 0-0-0
Duel Career : 6-0-1
| Subject: Re: Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:02 am | I forgot to mention that since it stays on the field it's possible to recycle it with the likes of Brionac, Mist Valley Falcon, Dewloren and more. That on top of Hidden Armory make its prospects of being unbanned severely low.
|
|
| |
Shawn112
Posts : 151
Duel Points : 100
Duel Season : 0-0-1
Duel Career : 4-0-23
YGOPro Name : Shawn112
| Subject: Re: Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:05 am | I start to understand why it is banned |
|
| |
Kenshi
Team : Super Friends
Posts : 569
Duel Points : 100
Duel Season : 0-0-0
Duel Career : 6-0-1
| Subject: Re: Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:08 am | It could be a an okay replacement for Monster Reborn if that gets banned, which is rightly should. The fact that it would need a replacement with 3 CoTH around is debatable. Otherwise it's gonna be waiting for a while. I'd like to think Konami aren't stupid enough to let us use Premature and Reborn in the same format. |
|
| |
Nichigo
Team : Super Friends
Posts : 722
Duel Points : 100
Duel Season : 0-0-0
Duel Career : 94-0-22
| Subject: Re: Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:26 am | REborn should deifnitely be banned. IDK if i'd agree to them bringing back premature burial though...although wiht 3 MST around, there are lots of outs to it... |
|
| |
Shawn112
Posts : 151
Duel Points : 100
Duel Season : 0-0-1
Duel Career : 4-0-23
YGOPro Name : Shawn112
| Subject: Re: Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? Sun Dec 16, 2012 3:28 am | How large is the line from getting from limited to banned? Probably not big. |
|
| |
Valkyra
Posts : 421
Duel Points : 100
Duel Season : 0-0-0
Duel Career : 19-0-2
| Subject: Re: Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? Sun Dec 16, 2012 8:59 pm | With CotH at 3, Premature Burial will most likely not be unbanned ever.
For that same reason, Konami should ban Reborn too lol. |
|
| |
Darkanen
Posts : 252
Duel Points : 100
Duel Season : 0-0-0
Duel Career : 0-0-10
| Subject: Re: Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? Tue Dec 18, 2012 5:46 am | Premature Burial is, true, quite not look a big deal vs Monster Reborn, but many thing do that Premature Burial is way too powerful than Monster Reborn. But Monster Reborn is limited because it's a return situational. If you're pratically dead, and you get Monster Reborn, you're not dead, so you're alive. And with the much use of solemn series, paying life point will make you in bad shape, lol!
For Monster Reborn, been ban is a think, but this card save many life... except if you lost it with an Lightsworn deck >< |
|
| |
ShadowServer
Team : Super Friends
Posts : 520
Duel Points : 100
Duel Season : 0-0-0
Duel Career : 15-0-9
| Subject: Re: Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? Tue Dec 18, 2012 12:33 pm | The reason Premature Burial is banned has another reason besides the REDMD/Hidden Armory deck that was popular. Premature Burial as written doesn't destroy the equipped monster when it's removed from the field in a way besides destruction. What this means is that things like Dewloren and Mist Valley Falcon turn it into a reusable Monster Reborn. That's the main reason it's never coming back. |
|
| |
Ace
Posts : 44
Duel Points : 100
Duel Season : 0-0-0
Duel Career : 8-0-3
YGOPro Name : Doodle
| Subject: Re: Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:21 pm | I don't think it should come back with or over Reborn. it's too searchable and recycable and the cost desn't really affect you that much. The fact that it stays, and that it's an equip spell card gives it alot of support options and I even think there is an OTK involved with this card, though I'm not sure if it's still valid or whatever. |
|
| |
| Subject: Re: Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? | |
|
| |
| Premature Burial, does it deserves to be banned more than Monster Reborn? | |
|